22nd
May 2009
MPs’ Pay and
Expenses- A ‘Not For Profit’ Organisation
When I became
MP for Hastings and Rye on the 1st May 1997 it was for
me the best job in the world. It still is. To be able
to represent my friends, my family and my neighbours in Parliament-
I’d have done it for free if that was possible.
I am perhaps
more distressed than my constituents that some colleagues appear to
have behaved so badly. I still hope and believe that most of
my colleagues are indeed honourable Members but all I can say is
what I have been up to and to explain perhaps a little more about
the ‘income and expenditure’ of MPs, which may not always be
obvious.
It’s my belief
that with so many wonderful folk in Hastings and Rye offering their
services as volunteers MPs should also be ‘not for profit’
organisations and I hope this will explain where I
stand.
MPs’ pay
I know for sure
that as an MP I earn a great deal less than many headteachers,
senior police officers, senior civil servants and indeed the senior
partners of solicitors- the job I was in before my present
role. My £693 a week pick up pay however is
fine by me; it pays the mortgage, it gives me a good standard of
living and I am always mindful that it is two or three times the
average income of my constituents.
In the current
climate I have followed Gordon Brown’s lead (together with other
colleagues) and I have forgone this year’s pay rise directing that
it be paid to the Charity Aid Foundation.
MPs’
Expenses
I do need some
expenses to do my job, and that’s the issue of the day, so let me
explain just what those expenses are and what I spend in doing the
job. Apart from my pay I receive reimbursement
towards:
a)
My travel
b)
My staff and office
costs
c)
Communication
expenditure
d)
Additional Cost Allowance (better
known as the second home payment)
A. Travel
costs
I am reimbursed
my travel costs when I travel by rail or by car. By rail,
although permitted to travel first class I never do. I use my
travel card and as with everything ensure that I secure for the
public purse the lowest possible cost, as if it were my own
money. I receive 40p per mile for using my car, which more or
less covers my cost. In 1997 it was up to 74.1p a mile! A rate
introduced by the former Tory Government but changed immediately by
Tony Blair when we came to office. We must of course
purchase, insure and run our own motor vehicles, recovering only
the cost of the mileage we do.
B. Staff and office
costs
I am justly
proud of the service we offer constituents- unmatched around here
in the past or the present. I maintain three offices- (a) in
Westminster, (b) in Bohemia Road and (c) at my home.
The
constituency office is open to the public from 9.30am to 4.00pm
each day with a human voice to answer every query. I employ
six full and part time staff (and often an intern too) who I
believe offer the best possible service of any MP office in the
land. It’s important but it costs. Shortly the accounts
for the years 2004/05, 2005/06, 2006/07 and 2007/08 will be
published, but I can tell you now that my expenditure incurred and
expenses recovered in those years was as follows:
|
|
Expenditure
incurred and agreed with Inland Revenue
|
Expenses
recovered from Department of Resources
|
Unrecovered
expenditure met by Michael Foster
|
|
2004/05
|
£96,084
|
£89,661
|
£6,423
|
|
2005/06
|
£107,352
|
£104,080
|
£3,272
|
|
2006/07
|
£110,023
|
£107,716
|
£2,307
|
|
2007/08
|
£113,223
|
£111,844
|
£1,379
|
I would not
normally make the point but in those years my total expenditure
exceeded the monies recovered in respect of staff and office costs
in each year, and amounted to £13,381 in
total. That I have paid from my own pocket. But I’m not
complaining
The above
overspends included additional staff costs and costs such as
attending the Hastings Sierra Leone twinning in Sierra Leone (£500)
as Hastings MP, together with other office expenditure.
NB The full accounts for these
periods will be published in July by the Parliamentary authorities,
but copies are available in paper form now for inspection in my
office.
C. Communications
Allowance
In 2007/08- the
first year of this allowance- I spent a little over £10,000 in
sending out Annual Reports and other communications to keep my
constituents informed. The total costs expended were entirely
on printing and distribution. I recovered most of what I
spent.
D. Additional Cost Allowance
(second home)
MPs have a
special job in that they do not simply ‘travel to work in London’.
Their work is based in two places; London and the constituency (in
my case Hastings and Rye). Because I have always lived in
Hastings my constituency home is my main home. I’ve lived
there for more than 30 years and I would not see that
changing. I do not claim any Parliamentary expenses for my
main home in St Leonards-on-Sea. Although in part it is used
as a third Parliamentary office I do not claim ‘rent’ as some MPs
have done. Neither do I have my Wisteria removed from my chimney at
the public’s expense!
It is possible
to return to Hastings on some occasions after the Parliamentary day
but generally on at least two nights per week Parliament doesn’t
adjourn until at least 10.30pm and last week on one occasion it was
1.30am. It is not practicable on those occasions to be back
in Parliament at 9.30am the next morning if returning to the
constituency in the meantime.
When I decided
that it was necessary to have a base in London I looked to see how
this could be achieved at the least possible cost and found that I
could purchase a long lease of a studio flat in the Elephant and
Castle, the mortgage interest on which would be less than the
rental of the same property, so I purchased the long lease
accordingly.
Because I am
aware that there is concern about MP’s use of the second homes
allowance I am attaching to this note my claims for the four years
in question- 2004/05, 2005/06, 2006/07 and 2007/08, in advance of
the publication by the Parliamentary Authorities in July. I
will explain how the figures work out.
Over the four
years I have incurred costs of less than two thirds of the maximum
allowed, but as this is a reimbursement of necessary costs I do not
see the need to spend public monies beyond the minimum that is
required to do my work.
It will be seen from the ACA
accounts (accessible at the bottom of this page) that there are
three types of expenditure (a) mortgage interest and
maintenance costs, (b) the purchase of necessary furniture and
furnishings, (c) miscellaneous costs including food and other
incidental expenditure of ‘living in
London’.
a) Mortgage interest and
maintenance costs
Over the four
year period I expended on mortgage interest, service charges,
maintenance and cleaning an average of £10,605 per annum or
£883 a month. Bank/Building Society
statements were provided to cover every part of this claim for
reimbursement.
b) Furniture and
furnishings
The initial
furniture in the flat was purchased by me without contribution from
Parliamentary funds when the lease was taken on. Only modest
replacement items have since been claimed for over the four year
period, as follows:
Digi-box for
Parliamentary channel:
£44.99
Jug
kettle:
£12.98
Foot rail for
bed: £22.00
Light
fitments:
£115.20
Additional
light fitment:
£8.49
Washing
machine:
£279.95
Delivery/fit
washing machine:
£35.00
TV/DVD (19
inch) and aerial:
£269.96
Total:
£788.57
(£197 per year)
c) ‘Living in London’
costs
Living in
London cost covers subsistence and other miscellaneous items
including household goods, cleaning materials, toilet and kitchen
rolls and small items of furnishings (less than £25). The Commons
authorities do not require and discourage receipts for items under
£25. A sum of up to £4,800 per year (£400 a month) is claimable for
food.
Typically
Members of Parliament ‘eat out’ in the House of Commons or nearby
and during the 35 weeks each year that Parliament is sitting would
expend weekly approximately the following on their own
food.
1 meal in
Members dining room with
colleagues
£15.00
1 meal in
Dining room with
guests
£23.00
Five meals
(lunch/dinner) in ‘canteen’, at
£4.50
£22.50
10/15 coffees
or
teas
£15.00
Tesco
‘shop’
£18.00
Total:
£93.50
Additionally
the following approximate expenditure is incurred with the
Refreshment Department (HOC) but for which I do not claim.
|
i)
|
Refreshments
(coffees, snacks etc) for staff, constituents, and other visitors
including schools attending Parliament. Over a
year
|
£350
|
|
ii)
|
Entertainment
(dinners, meals etc) for invited constituents, prize winners
(including Tea on the Terrace winners) and sponsorship of events
such as Methodist Fellowship, other group events etc, amounting
each year to
|
£900
|
|
iii)
|
Purchases of
whiskeys, wines, chocolates and other Parliamentary memorabilia for
raffles and other fundraising events requested by constituent
organisations over a year
|
£750+.
|
|
iv)
|
Own subsistence during recess when
in London
|
Infrequent
|
Total: £2,000
Although these
very substantial costs arise from Parliamentary life in London the
rules say it is only the MP’s personal expenditure that can be
reimbursed.
In order that I
should not ‘over-claim’ I have limited my claims to £80 or £85 a
week for the Parliamentary session only- nothing in the recess- as
a contribution to food costs and the household items referred to
above. I restrict my claim as I would be ‘eating’ if at home
but not ‘eating out’ all the time as is the norm in
Westminster.
Other (unrecoverable) costs of
Office
Labour Members
of Parliament are also required to pay from net salary
£1,300 per annum for the Parliamentary Labour
Party organisation as well as voluntary political
contributions.
Finally I am
also happy to contribute to local organisations who approach me in
my capacity as MP for financial contributions and to cover any cost
of events attended. It is somewhat embarrassing to raise this point
but in the past year charitable giving (over and beyond that which
I would give by way of personal contribution) has amounted to
approximately £1,750.
Second jobs as well as second
homes- the issue
To the extent
that I do any other work as a consultant solicitor for my former
firm (‘keeping my hand in’) I donate any profit to the Charity Aid
Foundation so as to ensure that I live entirely on an MP’s income
(any other income I receive from speeches (occasionally), surveys
etc is paid directly to local voluntary organisations. I do not
receive anything beyond my net salary as an MP).
I very much
welcome Parliament’s decision as from 1st July that
anyone who has a second job declares what it is, how long they
spend and how much they earn. Being an MP is a full time job
and leaves little room for much else.
Conclusion
I am not
wearing a ‘hair shirt’ and it is somewhat embarrassing to be
‘baring one’s soul’ on such issues as money but I want to be
unambiguous in making clear that I do not seek, and never will
seek, to profit from my role as a Member of Parliament. That
is a privilege and reward enough. Service to the community,
not self service, matters.
MICHAEL FOSTER DL
MP
HOUSE OF
COMMONS
LONDON
SW1A
0AA
22nd May 2009
Notes
1)
My wife Rosemary is a valued
member of my staff working part time as my Diary
Manager/Administrator. I do not disclose the salaries of any
member of my staff but can confirm that I expend c£91,000 on staff
salaries for six full and part time members of staff and that
Rosemary is paid less than three and more than two of the other
staff.
2)
The additional costs of Office
not recoverable in expenses over the four years of the accounts is
c£28,000 in addition to the
£5,000 political contribution to the
PLP.
3)
Copy of the letters sent to
constituents who have enquired and a copy of the letter sent to the
Hastings Observer to correct errors in their story of
22nd May are below
Constituent
letter:

Observer
letter:

Full
Accounts:
p1
p2
p3
p4
p5
p6
p7
p8
p9
p10
p11
p12
p13
p14
p15
p16
p17
p18
p19
p20
p21
p22
p23
p24
p25
p26
p27
p28
p29
p30
p31
|